Does presentation of a dish alter the way the food tastes? Does it say anything about the cook who made the dish? I am not doing a research on these subjects. I do not wish to get an Ig Nobel Prize for such a research. But replacing the food for a book, the presentation to the writing style and the cook to its author puts things in a different perspective. Would you read a book of an author whose character you dislike? Would you like the book for what it is?
I found out I am prejudiced in my opinions in such cases.
Oscar Wilde
On my iGoogle home page I have a widget that delivers 3 quotes everyday. I make a mental note of writers whose quotes are humorous but ironically true. George Bernard Shaw is one that appears regularly, Oscar Wilde is another. Off I went to pick up a book from any of these authors. Collection of Oscar Wilde's best was what fell into my lap. Picture of Dorian Gray was the first story. Soon appeared all those famous quotes from the mouth of Lord Henry. What I found discomforting in his writing style was the way he kept explaining the male beauty. I looked up about his biography and it was no surprise to find out that he was a bi-sexual. Maybe the terrible crowd in Mumbai trains have made me a homo-phobe. That was the last book I would read of Oscar Wilde no matter how good Importance of being Earnest would be.
On similar lines I disliked slight references made by Vikram Seth in A Suitable Boy.
Ayn Rand
This is one author of whom all I've heard is praise. After my aunt persisted I read Atlas Shrugged. I think I could write a whole book on why I disagree with Ayn Rand's philosophy of an ideal world. But the thing that irks me is the manner in which she thrusts her ideas on the reader. First drill the thought in, take a hammer and keep banging it in till its secure. Pick up another tool and go about the hammering to ensure job is complete. A 50-page non-sensical chapter called "John Galt speaking" can only be written by a psychopath.
I get reminded of a scene from V for Vendetta where V does something exactly similar to John Galt, but his words, his manner of delivering the same ideas are so effective. Effective because they are concise and leave scope for the audience to think on their own.
"... Ofcourse there are those who are to be blamed more than others and they will be brought to justice. But truth be told if you are looking for the guilty, you only need to look into the mirror. Why did you let this happen?..."
But Ayn Rand picks up every occupation on Earth and tells why everyone in the world is wrong. Even though I swore never to read that author again, I tried Fountainhead and comes back the pain again. Howard Roark, a rather quiet character in the beginning goes on to give a discourse similar to John Galt.
In this case, however, the prejudice is rather different. Ayn Rand has a huge cult following. I'm just compelled to go against the tide.
O. Henry
As a kid some of the best short stories that I came across were by O. Henry. After Twenty Years and The gift of the Magi are stories I remember vividly. Beautiful stories. The book I currently read is a collection of his short stories. In the preface I read that he was caught embezzling funds in some bank and ran away to Honduras. I read his stories in a completely different light now.
For similar reasons, I dont wish to read Arundhati Roy, V S Naipaul or even Salman Rushdie. Are my prejudices justified?